People are not satisfied with the data provided. Furthermore, you're hanging your explanation on the words of a spokesman. A proper examination should take place and it's not. Was it? Was the BIOS examined? We're talking Russia here, right (according to you)? They're not a third rate actor. Do you dispute the determination that Russia was behind the hack? The folks who are conducting the investigation appear to be satisfied with the data provided and confident in their finding. Just as I am not conducting the investigation, you are not either. As another poster pointed out, Comey testified that what Crowdstrike provided was sufficient. If the data is stored in the cloud, how would providing the server help? What difference does the RAID configuration make? It can be imaged regardless. Stringing a bunch of important sounding words together doesn't make you an expert either. It's time to turn over the server for proper analysis and the keys to any information they may have stored in a server farm or cloud. And he's taking the word of an unnamed spokesman who gives no technical details. He doesn't know what raid configurations the disks were in, what was captured in memory, what the images consisted of and if they were simply dirwalks. President Trump will hold an official bilateral meeting on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the sidelines of a Group of 20 summit in Germany, although it’s unclear how big the Russian election hacking scandalĪnonymous wrote:To the OP/PP, Jeff is an IT person, I think he is enough of a subject matter expert to comment with authority on the issue. But behind the scenes, discussions are growing louder, congressional sources say. Scrutinizing the DNC server hack and CrowdStrike’s analysis has not factored heavily in multiple probes exploring the Russia issue. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican who is leading the Judiciary Committee’s inquiry, told The Washington Times.
#So where is the dnc server full
“I want to find out from the company did the forensics what their full findings were,” Sen. Either way, a key “witness” in the political scandal consuming the Trump administration remains beyond the reach of investigators. Members of Congress say they still believe Russia was responsible but wonder why the DNC has never allowed federal investigators to get a look at the key piece of evidence: the server. Some critics say CrowdStrike’s evidence for blaming Russia for the hack is thin. Indeed, the only cybersecurity specialists who have taken a look at the server are from CrowdStrike, the Irvine, California-based private cybersecurity company that the DNC hired to investigate the hack - but which has come under fire itself for its work. It is perhaps the key piece of forensic evidence in Russia’s suspected efforts to sway the November presidential election, but federal investigators have yet to get their hands on the hacked computer server that handled email from the Democratic National Committee. Hacked computer server that handled DNC email remains out of reach of Russia investigatorsīy Dan Boylan - The Washington Times - Wednesday, July 5, 2017
0 kommentar(er)
